Property maintenance teams

A request with context.
A person to take it forward.

A business maintenance request needs a job reference, site, owner and next action; incomplete requests need a visible clarification queue.

An illustrative handoff

  1. 01

    An ordinary business maintenance request arrives.

  2. 02

    The authorised job reference and site are captured.

  3. 03

    The responsible team role receives a next action.

  4. 04

    Qualified staff decide assessment and scheduling.

Hypothetical process, not a deployed customer system.

Organise the work.
Leave judgement visible.

The purpose is to organise administration around a request, not assess the work itself. A job reference, the supplied location and the named next action can be connected without the workflow making a technical diagnosis or a commitment about when somebody will attend.

Record one source request in the existing job tracker and flag missing location or scheduling information.

What goes in.
What stays with you.

Information required

Authorised job reference, business site and supplied operational request fields.

Only agreed and authorised fields belong in the connection. We establish identifiers, field types, owners and the expected volume during feasibility. Do not send private sample records in an initial email.

The human decision

Qualified staff assess work, safety, access and pricing; the workflow prepares administration only.

Access instructions, tenant health details and other sensitive content should not be pulled into an ordinary enquiry workflow by default. An unclear location needs clarification. The pilot must not infer a safety priority, recommend repairs or calculate a quotation.

Outside this example: Safety diagnosis, technical recommendations, tenant health details, access credentials or automated quote calculations.

Start with
the actual process.

An existing system or a better checklist may already handle the need. We do not assume that a visible enquiry form or a manual step establishes a commercial problem.

Try the related fictional example

One workflow.
Only if it fits.

A narrow version may fit the £450 starter pilot after intended-tool feasibility: one input, one existing tracker and at most two approved app connections. The fee is not a sector-wide implementation package. Several channels, bespoke planning, data migrations and wider reporting require separate scope.

Read the pilot scope

A clear next step

Tell us about
one workflow.

What comes in, where should it go,
and who needs to act?

Discuss the handoff hello@workpassage.co.uk

A short outline is enough. Please leave passwords and private records out of an initial email.